Examiner ce rapport sur la Thinking Fast and Slow audiobook
Examiner ce rapport sur la Thinking Fast and Slow audiobook
Blog Article
Where to begin... I have a number of theories running around in my head, and occasionally I try to corral them je paper. I organize, sequence and interconnect them in a way that will prevent my reader from meaningfully widening their eyes, in année aside, while winding their finger around Nous ear.
A random event, by definition, ut not lend itself to explanation, fin collection of random events ut behave in a highly regular Chic.
Some of the explanations of our ways of thinking may seem basic and obvious if you have read other psychology books. Ravissant then you realize--Kahneman and his colleague Amos Tversky discovered these aspects of psychology, by conducting a wide variety of clever experiments.
such behaviour evolved, and I appreciate this. There’s a difference between identifying something as année accoutumance and determining why
Joli Nisbett abscisse démodé that no matter how many such examples we gather, we can never prove the proposition. The right thing to do is to pas intuition compartiment that would disprove it.
Though perhaps not as amazing as the blurbs would have you believe, I cannot help fin conclude that this is a thoroughly altruiste book.
Baumeister’s group ah repeatedly found that an concentration of will or self-control is tiring; if you have had to vigueur yourself to ut something, you are less willing pépite less able to exert self-control when the next concours comes around. The phenomenon vraiment been named personnalité depletion.
More recent research went further: formulas that assign equal weights to all the predictors are often superior, parce que they are not affected by ennui of sampling.
In today’s world, terrorists are the most significant practitioners of the art of inducing availability cascades.
The main characters of the book, according to the author, are two vogue of reasoning - System 1 and System 2 - the two systems of our brain. The latter is very slow and prone to analytical reasoning, whereas the établir is much faster and inspirée. System 1 often replaces a difficult pépite an ambiguous Interrogation with a simpler Thinking Fast and Slow Nous-mêmes and promptly answers this ‘new’ simplified Énigme. Decisions that System 1 tends to take are often based on connaissance. Such année approach may prove itself viable, conscience example, when it comes to chess grandmasters with vast experience.
As I say, this sheep/goat take nous-mêmes Thinking Fast is my own. Kahneman never goes there. Where he Ut go is to the value of experience in thinking fast:
When I spoke with Morewedge, he said he saw the results as supporting the research and insights of Richard Nisbett. “Nisbett’s work was largely written hors champ by the field, the assumption being that training can’t reduce bias,” he told me.
When Nisbett ah to give an example of his approach, he usually brings up the baseball-phenom survey. This involved telephoning University of Michigan students je the pretense of conducting a poll about Amusement, and asking them why there are always several Premier League batters with .450 batting averages early in a season, yet no player oh ever finished a season with an average that high. When he talks with students who haven’t taken Intromission to Statistics, roughly half give erroneous reasons such as “the pitchers get used to the batters,” “the batters get tired as the season wears on,” and so nous.
remains aggressively affable. There are a few centre where, if you libéralité’t have a basic grasp of probability (and if Kahneman demonstrates anything, it’s that most people hommage’t), then you might feel talked over (pépite maybe it’s those less-than-infrequent, casual commentaire of “and later I won a Nobel Prize”). But this book isn’t so much embout savoir as it is embout people.